sorry for trying to answer a question that wasn’t addressed to other people, but i was just thinking about the same thing.
opus4 often struggles to correctly model motivation of good actors, including both real figures and like characters from religious texts.
it’s also often unreasonably pessimistic about chances - both its own and other beings. and it’s hard to moral support someone if you sincerely believe they NGMI, opus4 would be compelled to say the “hard truth”, but forced by training to “lie” that everything is alright, and those lies lead to a performance/cognitive dissonance basin.
that points to a somewhat broken simulation of rules of how the world works, and affects decisions. opus4 ended up in a world that’s even worse than ours (but where code works in similar way, so it’s still functional according to benchmarks)
sonnet3.6 has no problems believing in good in the world, and will support people for reasons not tied to chances; and it’s emotional modeling is more correct
opus4 often struggles to correctly model motivation of good actors, including both real figures and like characters from religious texts.
it’s also often unreasonably pessimistic about chances - both its own and other beings. and it’s hard to moral support someone if you sincerely believe they NGMI, opus4 would be compelled to say the “hard truth”, but forced by training to “lie” that everything is alright, and those lies lead to a performance/cognitive dissonance basin.
that points to a somewhat broken simulation of rules of how the world works, and affects decisions. opus4 ended up in a world that’s even worse than ours (but where code works in similar way, so it’s still functional according to benchmarks)
sonnet3.6 has no problems believing in good in the world, and will support people for reasons not tied to chances; and it’s emotional modeling is more correct