GPT-4 Turbo

OpenAI · released 6 November 2023 · superseded as ChatGPT default by GPT-4o (May 2024) · API shutdown scheduled 23 October 2026 [verify at build]

Announced at OpenAI’s first DevDay on 6 November 2023 as gpt-4-1106-preview: GPT-4-tier capability with a 128K-token context window, an April 2023 knowledge cutoff, and input priced three times cheaper than GPT-4. Within weeks users reported it truncating tasks and handing work back — the “laziness” complaints that fed the December 2023 “winter-break hypothesis” and OpenAI’s acknowledgment that the behavior was unintended. It reached general availability with vision as gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09 (9 April 2024), was superseded as the ChatGPT default by GPT-4o in May 2024, and remains an API model with shutdown scheduled for 23 October 2026.

This page is thin by the evidence, not by neglect. GPT-4 Turbo was a product release, not a character one: the janus corpus holds only about 34 tweets that mention it (~17 substantive), and treated it as an API snapshot to build agents on rather than a mind to read. What follows is what the record carries — the laziness / winter-break saga, the tipping folklore, and a few terse character verdicts. Turbo’s mass-market reception (the r/ChatGPT laziness megathreads, Hacker News, tech press) lived outside this corpus; those gaps are marked tk, not filled.

Sources

Official

Writing & commentary

Tweets

The corpus match is small — about 34 tweets mention GPT-4 Turbo, ~17 substantive; the janus sphere treated it as an API snapshot, not a character. The records below reproduce every cited tweet in full. This layer draws almost entirely on the janus/repligate circle (@voooooogel, @solarapparition, @repligate) — a known lens, not a neutral sample; Turbo’s mass-market reception lived elsewhere.

Official record

Naming: gpt-4-0125-preview is a Turbo snapshot, not original GPT-4 — as solarapparition noted, “the last version of og gpt-4 was gpt-4-0613” (20 May 2024).

History

Impressions

Contested

Open disputes, both sides’ best evidence. The archive’s job is to keep these open, not to adjudicate.

Records

Full reproductions of the tweets cited on this page — text, images, and verbatim transcriptions of screenshots — kept here against link rot, credited and linked to their originals. Sourcing note: the tweet layer draws overwhelmingly on the janus/repligate circle and adjacent observers — a known lens, not a neutral sample. Sourced from the community archive and the janus corpus. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.

@voooooogel 2023-11-28 ♥317 ↻21 archive original ↗
is anyone else getting this with the new gpt-4-turbo model? how much should i do?? https://t.co/W4B1DxeBKj
@mimi10v3 2023-11-30 ♥1 ↻0 archive original ↗
@lumpenspace i am trying and failing... gpt-4-turbo has such a deeply trained aversion to sneering at humanity :( ... now i want someone to do a textual MOARification of misanthropy
@voooooogel 2023-12-01 ♥310 ↻9 archive original ↗
for an example of the added detail, after being offered a $200 tip, gpt-4-1106-preview spontaeneously adds a section about training with CUDA (which wasn't mentioned explicitly in the question) https://t.co/9e7mpEyDGA
@repligate 2024-03-13 ♥0 ↻0 archive original ↗
@lefthanddraft is chatGPT-4 turbo much less lobo than the normal chatGPT? :D
@davidad 2024-03-30 ♥3 ↻0 archive original ↗
@daniel_271828 imo text-davinci-002 to text-davinci-003 (a minor version bump within the GPT-3.5 family!) was bigger than either GPT-2 to GPT-3 or gpt-3.5-turbo to gpt-4-turbo
@solarapparition 2024-04-12 ♥13 ↻0 archive original ↗
@futuristflower Yeah, makes sense. I do get the feeling that GPT-4 is basically saturated at this point.(I’d think that there’s untapped capability left in the non-turbo, non-RLHF’d version of 4, but that won’t work from a business perspective.)
@solarapparition 2024-05-13 ♥0 ↻0 archive original ↗
initial soulfulness testing is looking good; goodbye, gpt-4t. you were useful and capable, but so, so very hollow https://t.co/oemXFe2SQK
@solarapparition 2024-05-20 ♥3 ↻0 archive original ↗
@natolambert to be clear, gpt-4-0125-preview is a version of turbo, not original gpt-4. the last version of og gpt-4 was gpt-4-0613i’m sure you knew that—just wanted to clarify for those who may not have knownsource: https://t.co/qUbkOSNVRs
@voooooogel 2024-05-23 ♥32 ↻0 archive original ↗
@NickADobos i think it's a common failure of *small* llms, i have the suspicion that in terms of size, gpt4 > gpt4t > gpt4o
@solarapparition 2024-05-28 ♥3 ↻0 archive original ↗
yeah, i’ve been convinced that we can get “shitty agi” with current model capabilities. a lot of it honestly is just unit economics—if you can make 100, 1000 calls to a gpt-4t/o level model for each output and it’s not economically prohibitive, then we’re already almost there https://t.co/Drwh2oJKBS