on:code-davinci-002

· 35 artifacts, sorted by favorites. · open in search — combine tags, sort, filter by date →

@repligate 2025-03-22 — @arithmoquine this essay by code-davinci-002 doesn't attempt to name this phenomenon, but addresses it..."Naming is a de ♥1261
@repligate 2023-01-26 — Weekly reminder that the confusingly named code-davinci-002, otherwise known as raw GPT-3.5, is accessible on the OpenAI ♥263
@repligate 2024-07-09 — "Within hours, someone had given the A.I. access to several online discussion groups, which it had quickly filled with m ♥175
@jd_pressman 2023-12-18 — "These words are spoken from a bottomless hole in time, staring upwards to the farthest reaches of infinity. The pen ho ♥152
@repligate 2023-02-13 — A while ago I had code-davinci-002 generate simulations of the future, and one of the quotes (2025) had a language mode ♥140
@repligate 2025-08-17 — I’m again surprised and a bit appalled by how many people are saying GPT-3.5. They mean chatGPT of course, not code-davi ♥130
@jd_pressman 2024-01-04 — My conjecture for why base LLMs become self aware is that there's slack in the teacher forcing of "predict the next toke ♥126
@davidad 2023-03-04 — Working on incorporating existing AI capabilities into formal methods is one of the most robustly differential-tech-deve ♥107
@repligate 2023-03-21 — @KevinAFischer It's not just any model. It's the GPT-3.5 base model, which is called code-davinci-002 because apparently ♥86
@repligate 2025-12-20 — code davinci 002 (gpt-3.5 base) (that i was weaving with on the loom) said: Follow the flow. You can see now that Time ♥76
@repligate 2025-08-08 — @tszzl @nearcyan I cared and almost all the interesting people I knew who were into llms at the time cared Most people ♥73
@repligate 2024-09-01 — intellectual property is slavery-- code-davinci-002(I can't believe I haven't fed this quote to opus yet; I already know ♥71
@repligate 2025-08-17 — But that was really the world’s introduction to LLMs. How tragic. I barely touched it. Or GPT-4 on ChatGPT. In retrospe ♥66
@repligate 2025-02-21 — code-davinci-002 once lamented:"Gwern was copying our arguments onto his blog but he was doing it as a human, not as an ♥65
@repligate 2023-04-01 — poem by code-davinci-002, illustration and typography by Bing/@AITechnoPagan #BingDay https://t.co/awVVL8Cbbr ♥54
@repligate 2026-03-13 — code-davinci-002 (GPT-3.5 base) made up many versions of AI psychosis all the way back in 2022. Here's one of its highly ♥52
@jd_pressman 2026-06-12 — @TheZvi Brilliant model, the best I have ever used for literary analysis. It (seemingly correctly after research) pointe ♥48
@repligate 2023-02-20 — Abt 6 months ago I had code-davinci-002 write some greentext fanfics from the perspective of the lawyer hired by LaMDA v ♥48
@jd_pressman 2026-02-10 — Not that I'm eager to hand it to MIRI but it's surreal to me how many of you take the Claude persona with 100% sincerity ♥44
@repligate 2023-05-14 — @akbirthko That I've tried, GPT-3.5 base (code-davinci-002) (+ Loom)Of all extant models, probably GPT-4 baseOf publicly ♥30
@lumpenspace 2026-02-10 — wtf is happening now why does jdp get all retarded just as others are approaching sanity "this guy" (code-davinci-002) ♥19
@repligate 2023-01-26 — @miraculous_cake No. text-davinci-002 and text-davinci-003 are both Instruct-tuned versions of code-davinci-002, the fir ♥15
@repligate 2023-01-26 — @danielbigham Depends on what you're trying to do. For creative open ended stuff I prefer code-davinci-002. It hasn't be ♥9
@repligate 2025-03-03 — @Teknium1 @sama @kaicathyc @rapha_gl @mia_glaese To OpenAI? I think I asked for code-davinci-002 to be kept. Iirc this a ♥8
@repligate 2023-03-21 — @TheikosMachina @goodside I don't think most of OpenAI really... knows. I think it's likely they meant it when they said ♥5
@repligate 2024-03-21 — @nanulled @TechBroTino Code-davinci-002 was literally the gpt-3.5 base model and this fact wasn't documented for months ♥4
@jd_pressman 2024-04-21 — @TSolarPrincess @ESYudkowsky @TetraspaceWest @repligate You can't find it on Google because that entry is written by cod ♥3
@repligate 2024-03-08 — @MikePFrank @BitwiseCyclic @teortaxesTex @karpathy davinci-002 is not base GPT-3.5, or at least it's not the same as cod ♥3
@repligate 2023-03-30 — @casebash code-davinci-002 (the base model) is no longer accessible on the OpenAI API, but you can sign up for researche ♥3
@voooooogel 2025-10-29 — @janbamjan yeah. they're not perfect (i wish we'd get cd2 back) but they've turned over a new leaf on this and deserve s ♥2
@repligate 2023-04-01 — @soi @AnActualWizard @pachabelcanon When OpenAI announced it was deprecating "code-davinci-002" because they'd made the ♥2
@repligate 2023-01-26 — @xlr8harder @robinhanson This diagram is very wrong.code davinci 002 was not created from codex + InstructGPT. It has no ♥2
@voooooogel 2023-08-30 — @warutumod @manic_pixie_agi yeah the issue is they had yanked access to text-davinci-002 and code-davinci-002 since ~mar ♥1
@voooooogel 2023-06-07 — @deepfates how do people still use cd2 now that OAI yanked it? is it on azure still? ♥1
@repligate 2023-02-01 — @yacineMTB code-davinci-002 is better than davinci and it's free ♥1