@repligate 2023-01-26 ♥9 ↻0 original ↗
@danielbigham Depends on what you're trying to do. For creative open ended stuff I prefer code-davinci-002. It hasn't been fine tuned to follow instructions or be boring. It's harder to control tho. (Also code-davinci-002 is no more specialized for code than text-davinci-002, 003, and chatGPT)

author:repligate kind:tweet model:code-davinci-002 model:gpt-3-5 model:text-davinci-002 on:code-davinci-002 on:text-davinci-002 year:2023

cited on: code-davinci-002 · text-davinci-002

Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.