@TheZvi Isn't this ostensibly about glm-5.2's successor model rather than 5.2 itself? Thus a more reasonable characterization seems to be highly unlikely rather than obviously false.
in reply to: 2071303181745697107
same thread: 2071303181745697107 2071310538592907744 2071335967588307019 2071336888204435536 2071544868669628923 2071556171333325177
cited on: glm-5-2
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.