# @unknown — 2026-06-28

♥0 ↻0 · https://x.com/i/status/2071330396399383038

@TheZvi Isn't this ostensibly about glm-5.2's successor model rather than 5.2 itself?  Thus a more reasonable characterization seems to be highly unlikely rather than obviously false.

tags: kind:tweet, on:glm-5-2, year:2026
cited on: _dossiers/glm-5-2.md, glm-5-2