@voooooogel 2026-03-27 ♥12 ↻0 original ↗
i am being a bit pedantic, sure, but part of my point is that codex and claude code are absolutely general, the fact that they aren't behind the API layer is irrelevant. (it's path-dependent compatibility because providers hew to the completions API. claude -p is a general mechanism.)

if they plan to redo the evals on these harnesses (or if I missed them doing that already) that's one thing. but i saw someone had vanilla claude cowork solving the puzzles pretty well, so...
in reply to: 2037677601326506315
same thread: 2037240394040435113 2037242298744918197 2037244941831987303 2037245428081844678 2037245680310509668 2037320914996789526 2037677601326506315

author:voooooogel kind:tweet thread-context year:2026

Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.