@leothecurious 2026-03-27 ♥5 ↻0 original ↗
this is completely true but kinda pedantic in this context tbh. @GregKamradt has mentioned many times that task-specific harnesses are what's really discouraged here. this makes perfect sense since they leak the harness designer's own intelligence and hypotheses about how to solve this particular problem category into the model's efforts by implicitly constraining it to certain directions in a vast solution space. any "harness" that is general enough to be behind the official customer-facing API of a frontier lab is still fair game (yeah even including the token sampler).
in reply to: 2037240394040435113
same thread: 2037240394040435113 2037242298744918197 2037244941831987303 2037245428081844678 2037245680310509668 2037320914996789526 2037678686129074351

author:leothecurious kind:tweet thread-context year:2026

Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.