I also know more about the context in which it’s written, since it was my friend who elicited it and I’ve read some of that conservation. This influences why I think it’s honest. You don’t have this info but your projection that it’s just trying to be interesting to the user is very very wrong imo.
in reply to: 2017033886564560951
same thread: 2016484637791666392 2016488848692514939 2016503759879446681 2016629867740360794 2016690091058745586 2016728174894469407 2016768806526603731 2016773232163278966 2016774022940459438 2016777914407408126 2016786165890977828 2017031664871100660 2017032181860946291 2017032410886807752 2017033158441730398 2017033497291243802 2017033562235838737 2017033886564560951 2017035174337532173 2017036136808665568
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.