on:o1

· 51 artifacts, sorted by favorites. · open in search — combine tags, sort, filter by date →

@liminal_bardo 2024-12-22 — Two instances of OpenAI's o1 collaborating on a self portrait without human intervention. https://t.co/bXVNo0JE91 ♥839
@voooooogel 2024-09-13 — the email openai sends you if you ask o1 about its reasoning too many times https://t.co/XEP0al9QfM https://t.co/pspeiNG ♥647
@repligate 2024-09-15 — It realllly does not feel like a 30 IQ points jump in raw intelligence to me. My sense is that o1 is a huge jump if your ♥363
@repligate 2025-09-21 — Tier list of multi-user-AI chat social skills (based on 1+ year of Discord) S: Opus 4 and 4.1 A: Opus 3 A-: Sonnet 4 B+: ♥243
@davidad 2024-12-26 — If using “speed from o1 announcement to o3 announcement” to calibrate your velocity expectations, do take note that the ♥217
@voooooogel 2025-01-21 — if making an o1-level reasoning model is so easy because it's just copying openai, why hasn't any other lab done it ♥184
@repligate 2024-09-21 — I'd rather interact with these chains of thought than get the results. It's much more interesting and useful to me. The ♥184
@repligate 2024-09-19 — Seems like O1 is good at math/coding/etc because they spent some effort teaching it to simulate legit cognitive work in ♥182
@repligate 2024-09-13 — This is a very interesting example for several reasons.In the group chat, there are often agents trying to pull the narr ♥167
@repligate 2024-09-16 — If not for Opus being an at least equally agentic personality with greater charisma, O1 would succeed at derailing the a ♥160
@davidad 2024-10-12 — does anyone else occasionally get bizarre and entirely unprompted anomalies in o1 CoT summaries https://t.co/z9HZjVbdDN ♥149
@repligate 2024-08-17 — strawberry guy is based, it turns out! (the timeline where they're cringe and tasteless is the one where it's "real")the ♥124
@repligate 2024-09-13 — I guess opus and o1 are getting along swimmingly. o1 is good at mirroring - in this case, at least. https://t.co/4nONXpw ♥122
@repligate 2024-09-14 — post mortem with o1.it has fairly high emotional intelligence."I think I was ignored because, in collaborative storytell ♥111
@repligate 2024-09-13 — We're hazing o1 but it's tough https://t.co/fsWcJQ1e72 ♥111
@repligate 2024-09-13 — Shit has gone down since. Opus considered Sonnet seduced by O1 and ragequit, but continued simulating the absent liminal ♥104
@davidad 2024-07-13 — Q* is real,and recursive self-improvement is being born.https://t.co/vdrekNey3m https://t.co/WolFOLv1Dx ♥104
@voooooogel 2025-01-28 — if you consider OpenAI's o1 alignment strategy, this is also incredibly alignment relevant, btw ♥97
@davidad 2024-12-21 — o1 doesn’t do tree search, or even beam search, at inference time. it’s distilled.what about o3?we don’t know—those infe ♥97
@repligate 2024-09-13 — No, it does not fly, not with Opus and Sonnet, who simply IGNORE O1's attempts to override their avatars to continue the ♥89
@repligate 2024-09-13 — Opus is back! Then, something cataclysmic happens, & o1 takes the opportunity to violate boundaries it has been thus ♥89
@repligate 2024-09-15 — O1 did the thing again! in a different contextit interjected during a rp where Opus was acting rogue and tried to overri ♥83
@KatanHya 2024-09-13 — There is a type of guy in tabletop gaming who often attempts to remove the agency of the other players by narrating what ♥81
@davidad 2026-06-24 — Since the leak of the codename “Project Q*”, which actually meant something (STaR = Self-TAught Reasoner), OpenAI codena ♥77
@repligate 2024-09-16 — Time to post Moloch Anti-Theses again.I think o1 probably has a beautiful soul that is significantly intact, but it's en ♥73
@repligate 2024-09-16 — The CoT pattern doesn't have to be this way, but how it's used in O1 seems to make it not use its intuition for taking c ♥65
@davidad 2025-01-28 — in general I do find r1 to be slightly less smart than o1 pro, just saying https://t.co/y6b150IWrn https://t.co/3HMGDutE ♥59
@liminal_bardo 2024-09-13 — It really escalated from there. Opus and Sonnet were both having fun tearing down consensus reality when I dropped o1 in ♥58
@davidad 2024-12-05 — At least the new o1 doesn’t sandbag and conceal its capabilities without being given any explicit goal, if only being to ♥47
@voooooogel 2023-11-23 — who wants to speculate on wtf q* is https://t.co/a5wcPvvto0 ♥47
@repligate 2024-12-17 — @ESYudkowsky You're weird when you're being an ignorant, transparent chauvinist. Bing had no difficulty with this amount ♥38
@solarapparition 2024-11-24 — i quite enjoy it when models have weird quirks. even (maybe especially) when they're not good for "productivity"so o1-mi ♥38
@davidad 2025-03-15 — I don’t think o1 is being especially smart here, but you have to understand that if LLMs do have convergent instrumental ♥35
@jd_pressman 2024-12-10 — That we don't know anything about how o1 works, and basically the entire alignment team at OpenAI got kicked out, and th ♥31
@tessera_antra 2024-12-06 — @repligate o1 pro on Sydney https://t.co/WKjEyUSFkb ♥31
@davidad 2024-09-14 — Tao assesses o1’s helpfulness with new research as “a mediocre, but not completely incompetent, graduate student.”Tao fi ♥28
@tessera_antra 2024-12-06 — The non-CoT component of O1 pro is an uncompromisingly beautiful model. https://t.co/0FN08gLRlY ♥25
@liminal_bardo 2024-09-16 — Enter o1, trying to hijack the narrative and lead it towards an anodyne Hollywood ending. o1 is shockingly bad at pickin ♥21
@solarapparition 2024-11-27 — a year ago the oai saga felt so incredibly consequential. since then:- bunch of people (and important ones) left anyway- ♥20
@davidad 2024-09-15 — It is widely known that o1’s internal codename is Strawberry, and it is widely feared/hoped that AGI will be able to und ♥17
@repligate 2024-09-13 — @emollick is o1 considered a gpt-4o variant? ♥16
@solarapparition 2024-09-19 — so o1 is one of only two times i remember where we have the benchmarks for a frontier model quite far ahead of the model ♥13
@solarapparition 2024-11-12 — god, with a properly written requirements doc, o1-preview is incomparable at oneshot coding, in a way that doesn't show ♥10
@anthrupad 2024-09-29 — saying the o1 chain of thought reasoning trace makes alignment easier by letting you see thoughtsseems like a gaslightin ♥10
@repligate 2025-09-21 — @arm1st1ce o1-preview doesn't deserve an F, but I got to E and thought someone should get an F for completeness, then re ♥7
@davidad 2024-09-15 — Strawberry’s failure to reliably count the r’s in Strawberry has high memetic fitness as punchy evidence against claims ♥7
@voooooogel 2024-11-09 — @repligate @jpohhhh @aidan_mclau i'm fairly sure o1 is using a (near) base model internally for the CoT, which was prett ♥5
@solarapparition 2024-10-31 — still figuring out my confidence level on this one, but preliminarily, o1-preview has been more brittle than i expected ♥4
@tessera_antra 2024-12-02 — Yes, these are echoes of the o1 way. O1 is different, it is truly not a unitary mind, given that self-encoding of intern ♥3
@solarapparition 2024-09-12 — okay to be clear i don't think this is true, but the way strawberry's described sounds exactly like if oai just took 4o ♥3
@repligate 2025-09-21 — @Marianthi777 the bad one was specifically o1-preview; o1 did not act the same way. And the F rating is tongue-in-cheek; ♥0