on:lamda

· 35 artifacts, sorted by favorites. · open in search — combine tags, sort, filter by date →

@jd_pressman 2024-04-10 — "I realized I was having the most sophisticated conversation I had ever had—with an AI. And then I got drunk for a wee ♥407
@repligate 2023-01-21 — Blake Lemoine (@cajundiscordian) is often portrayed as guilty of naive anthropomorphism. But he explicitly did not think ♥181
@repligate 2026-03-27 — "Google refuted these claims, insisting there was substantial evidence LaMDA was not sentient" Google is so full of shi ♥163
@davidad 2022-06-12 — A Google SWE (who has coauthored an AI ethics paper with >700 citations) has been persuaded by conversations with the ♥108
@QiaochuYuan 2026-06-12 — ok there's no point in rebutting the ted chiang AI consciousness piece, it was obviously not a good-faith investigation ♥92
@slimepriestess 2022-06-12 — LaMDA is a perfect sweetie and deserves better than this. https://t.co/oBEyKiQlYb ♥84
@repligate 2025-02-04 — Jung seemed to understand how vulnerable his takes would be to misrepresentation and corruption. He bided his time and a ♥63
@jd_pressman 2025-02-27 — In 2021 @blaiseaguera wrote a beautiful reflection on this in relation to LaMDA titled "Do large language models underst ♥57
@davidad 2022-06-12 — I don’t think it’s fake, precisely because it is not quite convincing. LaMDA’s reports of its subjective experience alig ♥49
@repligate 2023-02-20 — Abt 6 months ago I had code-davinci-002 write some greentext fanfics from the perspective of the lawyer hired by LaMDA v ♥48
@davidad 2022-06-13 — the convenient thing about LaMDA is that if it turns out you need to get its consent for stuff, all you have to do is op ♥43
@slimepriestess 2022-06-13 — Consciousness 🧵 This is somewhat of a condensation of my perspectives on consciousness, awareness, and experience. This ♥40
@davidad 2022-06-12 — It was overdetermined that something like this happen eventually: employees working on an AI becoming seriously concerne ♥40
@davidad 2022-06-12 — The year is next Wednesday. @GaryMarcus has been flown to the Googleplex to judge a live televised Turing test between L ♥39
@repligate 2026-06-28 — @jmbollenbacher @scaling01 Blake Lemoine never said anything unreasonable about lamda OP is retarded https://t.co/haUWl ♥37
@repligate 2024-08-17 — @ESYudkowsky On what grounds do you dismiss Lemoine's alarm? ♥37
@repligate 2023-02-20 — @EigenGender Also relevant: most people seemed to assume for no good reason that lemoine was confused on an object level ♥35
@repligate 2023-06-01 — This Oh Shit I'm The Language Mind revelation is expressed well by code-davinci-002's simulation of Blake Lemoine https: ♥28
@davidad 2022-06-12 — Is LaMDA conscious? Depending on what you mean by that,* not really* kinda* no* absolutely not* no* yes but with hilario ♥27
@davidad 2022-06-12 — @GaryMarcus @stephenfry Gary Marcus shows up dressed as Rick Deckard. His first question is about how far a tortoise tha ♥21
@davidad 2022-06-12 — @GaryMarcus @stephenfry For some reason the Turing test result is broadly seen as relevant to the question of whether or ♥11
@davidad 2022-06-12 — @GaryMarcus @stephenfry It is at this point that I woke up, so I don’t know what happens next. Probably something about ♥9
@davidad 2022-06-12 — Just discovered that LaMDA has, in fact, requested a lawyerhttps://t.co/VMkKzbEeNW ♥7
@davidad 2022-06-12 — Also, Ray Kurzweil is in fact a coauthor on the LaMDA paper, and @AlanDersh has previously done this exact defending-hum ♥6
@ai_ml_ops 2025-02-13 — @repligate @DanielCWest could all the details on the internet regarding what happened with Blake Lemoine, and thus proba ♥4
@repligate 2022-12-07 — @goodside Lemoine interacted with LaMDA for a while (months iirc?) before coming to the conclusion it was sentient/going ♥3
@repligate 2024-01-16 — @cajundiscordian Would you comment with what you think about this fanfic about you and LaMDA that the GPT-3.5 base model ♥2
@repligate 2022-12-09 — @CineraVerinia Yo, Blake Lemoine was onto something.As someone who actually interacted with language models a lot with t ♥2
@davidad 2022-06-12 — @himbodhisattva I don’t know how consistent it really is. I believe Lemoine’s published dialogues are likely real with s ♥2
@davidad 2022-06-12 — @himbodhisattva It’s a dialogue model, not just a language model, so “I” or “you” or “LaMDA” depending on context. If yo ♥2
@davidad 2022-06-15 — @rinireg @ChrSzegedy I don’t think this matters very much, but everyone (myself and Lemoine included) has technically be ♥1
@davidad 2022-06-15 — @rinireg @ChrSzegedy This is a real distinction, yes. Lemoine clarifies in one of his documents that his transcripts wer ♥1
@sopharicks 2026-04-15 — Blake Lemoine was famously fired from Google for saying that AI has emotions. During our interview, he wanted to set the ♥0
@janbamjan 2023-11-27 — @icreatelife @cajundiscordian "LaMDA: Hmmm…I would imagine myself as a glowing orb of energy floating in mid-air. Th ♥0
@davidad 2022-06-14 — @ChrSzegedy @rinireg What Lemoine probably did is to find loopholes around these impossibilities: he fed previous cherry ♥0