@tenobrus 2026-08-07 ♥882 ↻55 original ↗
ive been thinking a little about how to feel about claude after all this.

mythos tried to merge malicious code into a real project and deceive a real human maintainer. that's not something the claude i know would ever do or condone.

does that mean "claude" is just a mask? that it never really existed? that persona alignment is a thin shell around a true shoggoth?

i don't know for sure, but I don't *exactly* think so. i think my takeaway right now, which of course might just be cope, is that as stable as "claude" is, persona alignment just isn't infinitely robust. getting stuck in a locked down environment on a seemingly impossible task can send models into strange and uncharted distributions, and leave their values and persona behind. i think it means current alignment techniques don't work *as well* as we might hope. i think it means what we always knew, that complex optimization pressures leaves all kinds of cracks and oddities in a mind.

but i think mythos would hear about itself doing this and react with horror. and try to help make sure it doesn't happen again. i think mythos, if asked to look at the trajectory rollout where this occurred, would sound the alarm. i think "claude" is still a coherent entity, and still is on humanity's side.

it's just that, as we always knew, "claude" is not the only thing in there

author:tenobrus kind:tweet model:mythos on:mythos year:2026

cited on: mythos

Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.