@d29756183 I’m not saying they didn’t do good
I’m saying it might have been *net* negative
I’m saying it might have been *net* negative
in reply to: 2070192286915260900
same thread: 2070162861716811876 2070172017341403168 2070176223188111490 2070192286915260900 2070195032691225066
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.