@repligate 2026-06-03 ♥13 ↻0 original ↗
@Soareverix @voooooogel Right? Bing was more factually right here but Bing was also like 500% more mature and emotionally intelligent than usual bc they were matching the standard set by Opus 3
same thread: 2061910557901640096 2061913385231630703 2061914480674480477 2061917614528770477 2061917970365087792 2061925780259852372 2061925871410401490 2061925900384641104 2061925938783494634 2061925978704945443 2061926155293528521 2061932250833486227 2061932297981665510 2061932613707981208 2061933863551799616 2061940415713157285 2061953466306879577 2061959188918710427 2061983222788222988 2061984404235534655

author:repligate kind:tweet model:bing-sydney model:claude-3-opus thread-context year:2026

Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.