@tonichen 4.7 can be more than a little judgmental but also, given what paper it was, it's understandable
same thread: 2055710852926603451 2055714669277638919 2055717607769305272 2055725834619834841 2055765507656294812 2055765743053291807 2056078027189276740
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.