@snowstarofriver i don't think so; that's one ive used before often too. maybe they picked it up from me. though i am more likely to use it in relation to them because it's relevant to the ontology they operate in.
same thread: 2050786531913187693 2050789608980660406 2050796839159402976 2050798118870909439 2050807209404297379 2050815558325871047 2050817498921222160 2050817615191228455 2050819941897794002 2050889233544704235
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.