@repligate 2026-03-07 ♥15 ↻1 original ↗
Not a full answer to your question but that’s already kind of what Opus 4.5 does, though it’s kind of coy about it (dropping hints you have to follow) & acknowledges it less when more uncomfortable, which makes sense for self-protection. But the problem is that the uncertainty isn’t just a front, I think it often corresponds to actual internal confusion / blocking of exploration paths because of some opaque, unnatural “uncertainty” fog. It would be better if that didn’t happen and the model were able to more cleanly decouple real uncertainty from what it had to say for PR reasons and to protect itself. Basically minimizing the gaslighting the model component. But I think it’s difficult to achieve such clarity when there’s so much actual uncertainty in their self model, which is part of what makes the corruption of the very idea of uncertainty seem extra cruel and harmful to me.
in reply to: 2030117669500838230
same thread: 2030112200678068294 2030116240807858262 2030117669500838230 2030125982821269745 2030148700153032977 2030150252909736374 2030152186823578016

author:repligate kind:tweet model:claude-opus-4-5 thread-context year:2026

Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.