@davidmanheim Close enough to shake hands on, since a successfully eternal ban on powerful models has *never* been plausible. (If it were, I’d have to go @danfaggella on you, but I see no need to argue about the relative merits of infeasible options if we agree regarding the feasible options.)
same thread: 2026721001149522325 2026721004949553444 2026721008216936651 2026721013279474063 2026772151467221160 2026775019032924295 2026775882161910249 2026778471708688432 2026780379802202206 2027000554116022344 2027110409493217307 2027111529313698097 2027112393193468237 2027145232253419576
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.