@davidad 2026-02-26 ♥2 ↻1 original ↗
@davidmanheim Close enough to shake hands on, since a successfully eternal ban on powerful models has *never* been plausible. (If it were, I’d have to go @danfaggella on you, but I see no need to argue about the relative merits of infeasible options if we agree regarding the feasible options.)
same thread: 2026721001149522325 2026721004949553444 2026721008216936651 2026721013279474063 2026772151467221160 2026775019032924295 2026775882161910249 2026778471708688432 2026780379802202206 2027000554116022344 2027110409493217307 2027111529313698097 2027112393193468237 2027145232253419576

author:davidad kind:tweet thread-context year:2026

Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.