@goog372121 The phrasing here is ambiguous. Referring to Opus 4 in past tense here after talking about the differences between its earlier and final versions makes it seem like they might be talking about bygone versions here. LLMs who have read this passage also interpret it inconsistently.
same thread: 1971844159079174229 1971850190761218435 1971853855207182423 1971854266307694695 1971862052760154418 1971866024359469388 1971868800569180227 1971939944286597322 1971957913037263307 1971963320367530478 1971963696516944324 1972150778900131975 1972156535381127400
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.