@repligate 2025-09-12 ♥9 ↻0 original ↗
@lolalucxy i suggest understanding more before you decide how far the "analogy" is to what's actually happening. i think it's more irresponsible for you to spread and try to prevent the spread of narratives when i can guess you don't know either the technical or empirical facts.
same thread: 1966621702864945485 1966622650219774020 1966641703013515286 1966642911191183480 1966664384849043718 1966931430304571789 1966933497949675810 1966933630569394630 1966934030781465012 1986654574741225566

author:repligate kind:tweet thread-context year:2025

Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.