@tryfectaa @LocBibliophilia No, the person you’re talking to has a better idea
same thread: 1966242395978170494 1966249814741667958 1966565864808849664 1966566423557230813 1966580241049981244 1966595691607654482
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.