I say this in part bc I often see people responding to "LLMs predict the next token" with complicated philosophical tangents trying to get at why that's a reductive framing when the person saying that probably doesn't know or hasn't internalized that LLMs are trained with RL
in reply to: 1965659230486364420
same thread: 1965659230486364420 1965671437785850025 1965675596127916061 1965675833265455341 1965676704363618803 1965683813461491807
cited on: observations
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.