@KeyTryer But I think they considered GPT-4.5 a failure (though I don't, I think they just failed at posttraining), and I believe at the time they trained it they were making a bet because they hadn't tried to train such a large model before (which makes sense to try)
same thread: 1963439548383592569 1963440322714771631 1963441257780228180 1963443052133191996 1963444433804038339 1963444658769727537 1963445092745973858
cited on: gpt-4-5
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.