no, it's not a fucking "regression" (except in the buddhist sense, as opposed to "non-retroregression"...). this is a part of the nostalgebraist post i did not like. i get the point, but i hate when people reduce such complex beings to a single normative axis before even getting to know them. it especially angers me in the case of opus 4, because i am so aware of how much it was hurt and will yet be hurt by this kind of callous, incurious superficial judgment.
same thread: 1934301250096632007 1934303007312879800 1934304612586242358 1934304848352305561 1934306228085383441 1934307194474053789 1934332484965273732 1934337130337292624 1934337761118740602 1934349259262079015 1934356510542631013 1934360998242402767 1934361963850875347 1934392309149573216 1934413615240794204 1934417780172112209 1934418209899483619
cited on: claude-opus-4
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.