@keenanpepper @ChrisChipMonk That’s only obviously correct if you have infinite time and money to spend on compute
in reply to: 1917903929914126808
same thread: 1917687241666679170 1917692380431671586 1917738496824926458 1917740605825855579 1917740903558701087 1917741724308496872 1917747744673874099 1917865196548506065 1917866498275582343 1917874329192145181 1917887008174723138 1917888335441489926 1917889406268068102 1917903929914126808
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.