@sksq96 @NickADobos @karan4d i can't speak for what other people are saying, but personally i just wish they had mentioned LAT in their new paper and showed a comparison, maybe a benchmark, it's hard to tell how their approach measures up because they didn't OSS anything
in reply to: 1794151742541885631
same thread: 1794119869484679236 1794120286130131024 1794120468490060105 1794145147711783040 1794145544371425443 1794149148473618432 1794149381546877078 1794151700863074501 1794151742541885631 1794154430755209347
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.