@tangled_zans @_julesh_ On the other hand, essentially nothing GPT-2 ever says is both substantive and valid. The citations stand out as exciting because we don't expect the *title* of a paper to contain any substance. But if we could extract GPT-2's idea of their contents, they'd doubtless be nonsense.
same thread: 1215025784227688449
cited on: gpt-2
Reproduced against link rot, credited and linked to its original. Yours and you’d rather it weren’t here? Open an issue.